Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Keen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1974No. Docket 18176PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, P. J.

(affirming in part, reversing in part). This Court finds that MCLA 257.625a(l); MSA 9.2325(1)(1), as amended, applies only to charges of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or driving while impaired. The testing procedure and the delineation of the right of refusal or consent relates only to those crimes. As such, consent to testing for blood alcohol content is irrelevant under charges for other crimes. As to crimes other than DUIL or driving while impaired, there are reasons separate and distinct from the statute which allow the taking of intoxication tests and the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. KeenMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gilbert v. LeachMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Bowerman v. MacDonaldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. BlondiaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API