Legal Opinion
Tally v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 22, 1974No. Docket 16490PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.
Before us are topless go-go dancers and a city ordinance attempting to regulate them and their employers. Jads, Inc v Detroit, 41 Mich App 693, 699; 200 NW2d 715; decided July 3, 1972, involved the same institutions. At that time Judge (now Justice) Levin opined that:
"On remand a declaratory judgment shall be entered granting Jads a judgment declaring that the ordinances in question do not prohibit topless go-go dancing.”
In the instant case, the plaintiffs brought an action to have certain amendments of the Detroit City Code pertaining to the regulation of topless go-go dancers declared…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Perrine v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Brazee v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Carolene Products Co. v. ThomsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Grocers Dairy Co. v. Department of Agriculture DirectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Frank D. Felix D/B/A Club Zeus v. Coleman A. Young, Mayor, City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of Sault Ste. Marie, Mich. v. AndrusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
- Jott, Inc v. Clinton Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Kalita v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.