Legal Opinion
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Marten
District Court, D. Montana
Decided May 30, 2017No. CV 17-21-M-DLCPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
Before the Court is the motion for preliminary injunction of Plaintiffs Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Defendants Leanne Marten, Regional Forester for Region One of the United States Forest Service and the United States Forest Service (collectively “Defendants”) oppose the motion. As discussed below, the Court will grant the motion and preliminarily enjoin the Stonewall Vegetation Project until a final ruling is issued on the merits.
BACKGROUND
On February Í7, 2017, Plaintiffs filed suit seeking…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. MartenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. MulhollandDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al. v. Christopher Carlton, Acting Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Northern Region, et al.District Court, D. Montana · 2026
- BlueRibbon Coalition, Inc v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.