Legal Opinion
O'ROURKE v. Jason Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 10, 1997No. Civil Action 94-30167-MAPPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review this Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. Plaintiffs motion to enforce the settlement is DENIED; defendant’s motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED. The clerk is ordered to enter judgment for defendant. So ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (Docket No. W and DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 50)
August 15, 1997
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter concerns Kevin O’Rourke (“Plaintiff’)’s motion to enforce a professed settlement…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Bruce W. KEATING, Sr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Greene v. General Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- I v. Services of America, Inc. v. Inn Development & Management, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Enos v. Union Stone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Smit Americas, Inc. v. the M/T MANTINIADistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
- Horney v. Westfield Gage Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.