Horney v. Westfield Gage Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS (Docket Nos. 209, 210, 212, 218 and 221)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On November 5, 2001, after more than two weeks of trial, a jury entered a verdict which was favorable to Anita Horney (“Plaintiff’) in this employment discrimination action. 1 The jury found both defendants — Plaintiffs former employer, West-field Gage Co. (“Westfield Gage”), and her former supervisor, Edward Woodis (“Woo-dis”) — liable to varying degrees; it found Westfield Gage liable for gender discrimination (in the amount of $750,000), for sexual harassment…
2Cases cited101 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peña v. Ingham County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Horney v. Westfield Gage Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Kelly Capital, LLC v. S & M Brands, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012