Legal Opinion
Haskell v. Washington Township
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1989No. 89-3857PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The plaintiffs appeal a district court order denying their motion for Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 sanctions against the defendants. An order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction was entered on September 26, 1989. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs have filed a single response to both the show cause order and motion. The defendants have replied.
The show cause order and motion to dismiss are premised on the lack of certification for an interlocutory appeal pursuant to *133Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) or 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The plaintiffs respond…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Jean Knafel Karen Wuchich v. Pepsi Cola Bottlers of Akron, Inc. Stanley Levin James Davis and General Cinema CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Kordich v. Marine Clerks AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Ferdie Meche v. Dan-Tex International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by12 opinions
- GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Eric Clausen v. Sea-3, Inc., Storage Tank Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Good v. Ohio Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Colvin McCright Jr. v. Michael Santoki R.G. BorgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Empresas Omajede, Inc. v. Bennazar-ZequeiraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.