Legal Opinion
Colvin McCright Jr. v. Michael Santoki R.G. Borg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1992No. 91-15905PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Colvin McCright, Jr. (“McCright”) appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion for Rule 11 sanctions against opposing counsel. Because the underlying action has not yet come to judgment, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Background
During the pre-trial phase of a 42 U.S.C. § 1988 suit challenging his transfer from San Quentin to New Folsom prison, McCright moved the district court for a preliminary injunction and for Rule 11 sanctions against opposing counsel. McCright sought the preliminary injunction to protect himself against alleged retaliatory measures taken…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- G.J.B. & Associates, Inc. v. SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Eli Mesirow and Thomas Morris v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., a Connecticut CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Lee MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Conterez v. O'DONNELLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Empresas Omajede, Inc. v. Bennazar-ZequeiraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Mary A. Buchanan, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gordon Buchanan, Jr. v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Berliner v. Kusek (In re Kusek)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.