Legal Opinion

Miller v. Nationwide Insurance Company, No. Cv99-0431545s (Jun. 29, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 29, 2000No. CV99-0431545SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The question presented to the court by the parties on this Application to Vacate Arbitration Award is whether the arbitrators correctly applied the law in determining that Christopher Ferro was not an individual covered by an insurance policy issued by the defendant Nationwide Insurance Company. The more difficult issue for the court, however, is applying the proper standard of review — deferential or de novo — to such an arbitration to comply with the statutes and policies governing arbitrations.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Caldor, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Saturn Construction Co. v. Premier Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API