Scott v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
This appeal from appellant’s conviction primarily for obstruction of justice (D.C.Code § 22-722(a)(2) (1989 repl., 1995 cum. supp.)) presents the single question of whether the trial judge properly defined that offense in instructing the jury. We hold that the instruction given properly mirrored the law on the facts of this case. We therefore affirm.
The government’s theory was that appellant had obstructed justice by sending Sher-ice Brown threatening letters designed to dissuade her from testifying against him in criminal proceedings that arose from a complaint of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Armintrout v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Abdulshakur v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wildwood Storage v. Mayor & CouncilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Bureau of Employee Relations v. Maine Labor Relations BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert Lee Parrish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dargan v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Holmes, Jr. v. DC Department of Housing & Community Development and 1516 & 1520 Holobrook Street NE Tenants Association, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020