Legal Opinion
Riley v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 1994No. 92-CF-1230, 92-CF-1268 and 92-CF-1557PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
The convictions of appellants Riley and Davis and all convictions of appellant Allen, except the conviction for subornation of perjury, are affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion by Judge King which is joined (except as to Allen’s subornation conviction) by Judge Ferren and Judge Schwelb. The conviction of appellant Allen for subornation of perjury is reversed for the reasons set forth in the separate opinions of Judge Ferren and Judge Schwelb; Judge King dissents from the reversal of that conviction for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion.
No. 92-CF-1230
Affirmed.
No.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Stroman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Scales v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Tawanda Sheffield, Steven D. Lewis, and Allen Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.