Weinberg v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree which permanently enjoined appellants, defendants below, from enforcing a certain ordinance passed by the City of Duluth, insofar as such ordinance prohibits the use of a certain General Electric 44-ton Diesel electric engine in performing certain switching movements in the switching yards of appellee in the said city, unless the engine be manned with a crew of not less than one qualified engineer or operator and one qualified fireman or helper. Defendants, who are here appellants, are officers of the City of Duluth, Minnesota, while the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- R. H. Fulton v. Chicago, Rock Island And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Nicholas TutinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Everhardt v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Charlestone Stone Products Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- City of St. Paul, a Municipal Corporation v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company, and Chicago and Northwestern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.