Legal Opinion
In Re Audet
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 1, 2004No. 03-060PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Appellants John and Dorothy Mitchell appeal a declaratory ruling by the environmental board that appellee Real Audet does not need to obtain an Act 250 permit for his vehicle salvage business in the Town of Worcester because of his temporary but now abandoned use of a separate parcel of land outside of town. We affirm.
¶ 2. Audet repairs and sells cars and trucks. His business is located on two contiguous tracts of land near the town center. In January 2001, Audet purchased a third tract on Hersey Road, about three-tenths of a mile away from his main business. The Mitchells also live on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Braun v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Conservation Law Foundation v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Sorge v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re HuntleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In re Treetop Development Company Act 250 Development (Treetop at Stratton Condominium Assn., Inc., Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Willard v. PARSONS HILL PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- In Re CVPS/Verizon Act 250 Land Use Permit Numbers 7C1252 & 7C0677-2Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In re North East Materials Group LLC ACT 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.