Legal Opinion
Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Miracle Optics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 10, 2006No. 2004-1265PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Aspex Eyewear, Inc. and Contour Optik, Inc. appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissing their action against Miracle Optics, Inc. and Viva Op-tique, Inc. on the ground that neither As-pex nor Contour had standing to sue for infringement of U.S. Patent 6,109,747. 1 Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Miracle Optics, Inc., No. 01-10396 (C.D.Cal. Feb.6, 2004) (“Decision ”). Because we conclude that Contour was the owner of the ’747 patent when the original complaint was filed, and thus it had standing to sue in this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Prima Tek II, L.L.C. v. A-Roo Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Nanya Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Azure Networks, LLC v. Csr, PlcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Propat International Corp. v. RPost, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Electronics Co. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.