State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The ultimate relief sought by Southern Bell on this appeal is reversal of the Commission’s Order and remand to the Commission for further findings and a new order in accordance with legal principles that Southern Bell contends should govern this proceeding. The Commission, Southern Bell contends, erred in that it: (1) failed to find Southern Bell’s cost of equity capital as a material fact prerequisite to setting a fair rate of return on the utility’s rate base; (2) understated the rate base by improperly excluding therefrom certain amounts for materials and supplies and cash…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Benvenue Parent-Teacher Ass'n v. Nash County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- United States v. Anchor Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Staton v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Wikel v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Cochran v. . RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Automobile Rate Administrative OfficeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.