Legal Opinion

Stoney v. MacDougall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1976No. 7625SC495PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

G.S. 48-23(3) states that

“From and after the entry of the final order of adoption, the words ‘child,’ ‘grandchild,’ ‘heir,’ ‘issue,’ ‘descendant,’ or an equivalent, or the plural forms thereof, or any other word of like import in any deed, grant, will or other written instrument shall be held to include any adopted person, unless the contrary plainly appears by the terms thereof, whether such instrument was executed before or after the entry of the final order of adoption and whether such instrument was executed before or after the enactment of this section.”

Appellant argues that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Olive v. BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Stoney v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Wachovia Bank and Trust Co. v. ChamblessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Pittman v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Stoney v. MacDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API