Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 20, 1952No. 10630_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition to review a cease and desist order of the Federal Trade Commission. ■ The amended complaint charged petitioner with unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. 1

Petitioner’s principal place of business is at Chicago, Illinois, and he operates under the trade names of Gen-O-Pak Company, American Deposit System, and Manpower Classification Bureau. Under each trade name petitioner sells services and literature intended to be used in locating delinquent debtors.

Operating as the Gen-O-Pak Company,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. DDD CORPORATION v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  4. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  5. Progress Tailoring Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Mosk v. National Research Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Ai v. Frank Huff Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bartner v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Maurice J. Feil and Leo a Loeb, Individually and as Co-Partners Trading as the Enurtone Company v. Federal Trande CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API