Legal Opinion

Middendorf v. Middendorf

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1998No. 97-261PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

In this case, we examine the legal standards for determining when appreciation in separate property becomes marital property for purposes of the division of property in a domestic relations case under R.C. 3105.171. Max asserts that in order for a court to determine that an increase in separate property is marital property, the court must find that both spouses have expended significant marital funds or labor directly contributing to the increase or that the non-owning spouse must contribute substantial work to improvement and maintenance of the separate property. We disagree.

In Worthington…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Berish v. BerishOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ross v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Holcomb v. HolcombOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. NicholasOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Middendorf v. MiddendorfOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. JordanOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Windsor v. Riback, 2007-G-2775 (4-25-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Schroeder v. NieseOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API