Legal Opinion

Ross v. Ross

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1980No. 80-478PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before this court is whether the trial court’s determination that the best interests of the children would be served by a modification of custody was against the manifest weight of the evidence.

This court does not undertake to weigh the evidence and pass upon its sufficiency but will ascertain from the record whether there is some competent evidence to sustain the findings of the trial court. Foster v. Scottish Union & Natl. Ins. Co. (1920), 101 Ohio St. 180, 185; Indemnity Co. v. Bd. of Commrs. (1923), 107 Ohio St. 51, paragraph one of the syllabus; Katz v. American Finance Co.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Baxter v. BaxterOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Kobelt v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Katz v. American Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Palladino v. PalladinoOhio Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gerijo, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Middendorf v. MiddendorfOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Fletcher v. FletcherOhio Supreme Court · 1994

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API