Legal Opinion

Gorsalitz v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 20, 1962No. 13978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERLEIN, Justice.

Appellants, Richard W. Gorsalitz and wife, brought this suit against Dr. G. G. Harris, a dentist, to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by Mrs. *575Gorsalitz and proximately caused by ap-pellee’s negligence in connection with the extraction of her upper right first molar and post-operative treatment thereof. At the conclusion of appellants’ evidence, the court on motion of appellee instructed a verdict in favor of appellee, and entered judgment thereon that appellants take nothing.

It is necessary to review briefly the evidence in an effort to determine…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  3. Ramberg v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Kaster v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Barker v. HeaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harle v. KrchnakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Williford v. BanowskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Maedgen v. KolodnyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Gorsalitz v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Gorsalitz v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API