Legal Opinion

Barker v. Heaney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1935No. 9543PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

The parties will here be designated plaintiff and defendants, as they were in the trial court.

This suit was instituted by Ramona Barker, as plaintiff, against four physicians, Doctors Harry G. Heaney, J. Nast, Burch Thompson, and E. F. Stroud, seeking to recover damages accruing to her by virtue of the death of her husband, Cleveland (Cleve) Barker, alleged to be the result of the negligent acts of the above-named defendants while performing an operation upon the deceased.

The case was tried to a jury. The court instructed the jury to return a verdict in favor of Dr. J. Nast…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Lippold v. KiddOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ramberg v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Pettigrew v. Lewis & WillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Haddock v. ArnspigerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Nishi v. HartwellHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hasemeier v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Kritzer v. CitronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API