Legal Opinion
Williford v. Banowsky
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 16, 1978No. 5119PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALEIGH BROWN, Justice.
This is a dental malpractice case.
Mary Williford sued Dr. Richard L. Ba-nowsky for damages as a result of personal injuries allegedly incurred as a result of a cut received while obtaining dental treatment. The trial court instructed a verdict for Dr. Banowsky. From the take nothing judgment, Mrs. Williford appeals. We affirm.
In six points of error, Mrs. Williford urges the court erred in granting Dr. Ba-nowsky’s motion for instructed verdict because (1) expert medical testimony was not required to establish negligence and proximate causation under the facts of this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Hart v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Giambozi v. PetersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Constant v. HoweTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Harle v. KrchnakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Haddock v. ArnspigerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Martin v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Nevauex v. Park Place Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Sullivan v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
- Ortiz v. Santa Rosa Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.