Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Charles Coleman, appeals1 following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal2 from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims on appeal that the habeas court: (1) abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal; and (2) abused its discretion in granting the motion of the petitioner’s counsel to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). We dismiss the petitioner’s appeal.
The following facts and procedural history…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Lorthe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Crespo v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.