Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 23, 2007No. AC 25636PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

The petitioner, Charles Coleman, appeals following the habeas court’s denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion by (1) denying his petition for certification to appeal, which challenged the habeas court’s order allowing his attorney to withdraw over his objections, and (2) granting his attorney’s motion for permission to withdraw. We dismiss the appeal.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lorthe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Logan v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Riddick v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  5. Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API