State v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
SEILER, Judge.
The question presented is, where there were no Miranda warnings given to defendant after his arrest and prior to his being interrogated by the police, can statements made be used by way of impeachment over defendant’s objection that they are not voluntary, without first a hearing and affirmative determination by the trial court as to their voluntariness?
There was evidence from the state’s witnesses from which a jury could reasonably have found that defendant broke into the victim’s house and raped and robbed her. The jury convicted him of burglary, robbery, and rape, with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. LytleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- State v. GoodmonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Brittingham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.