Legal Opinion

Brittingham v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 11, 1986No. 107, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUCH, Judge.

This case presents questions involving the admissibility of evidence concerning the voluntary nature of an otherwise inadmissible inculpatory statement introduced for the limited purpose of impeaching the defendant’s credibility. Since this matter is entirely one of procedural concern, a full recitation of the facts is not necessary. 1 Relevant facts will be incorporated herein where appropriate.

James Brittingham, Jr., petitioner, was charged in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City with various offenses, as the result of an incident which occurred on October 10, 1982. On November…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Caldor, Inc. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Rush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API