Legal Opinion

State v. Cedeno

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2011No. C-970465PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Edgar Cedeno appeals from his convictions upon jury verdicts finding him guilty on four counts of aggravated robbery, four counts of robbery, and nine counts of kidnapping. He presents on appeal two assign*743ments of error. Finding no merit to the challenges advanced there, we overrule the assignments of error. But because the trial court failed to sentence Cedeno in conformity with the statutory mandates concerning postrelease control, we vacate his sentences in part.

On Reconsideration

{¶ 2} Cedeno was convicted in 1997. He unsuccessfully appealed his convictions to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HackneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. TibbsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. CephasOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. DurganOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. HoustonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API