Legal Opinion
State v. Guzman
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided October 5, 1994No. 20604, 20637PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION. THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED OCTOBER 4, 1994, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Victor Guzman (Guzman) was tried with a co-defendant for committing robbery at a grocery store. I.C. § 18-6501. They were represented by the same court-appointed attorney at trial and were found guilty. On appeal from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief, Guzman asserts that the court erred when it admitted certain testimony at trial and when it denied his motion for separate trials. He also asserts that he was denied…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Nevarez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ronald Eddington v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. BordeauxIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Eddington v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.