Ronald Eddington v. State

Ronald Eddington appeals from the district court’s summary dismissal of Eddington’s petition for post-conviction relief. Eddington specifically argues the district court erred in summarily dismissing Eddington’s claims that Ms trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Additionally, Eddmgton maintains the trial court erred in failing to inquire into trial counsel’s conflict of mterest. For the reasons explained below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 9, 2013, Eddington broke into Ms ex-wife’s home, held her at gunpoint, and…