Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, LLC v. Public Service Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2011No. Docket 139541, 139542, 139544, and 139545Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMarkman, J.

Although I concur in the majority’s holdings that the Public Service Commission (PSC) was not required to include interest on the refund it ordered Cherryland Electric Cooperative to pay and that the PSC was not required to impose a fine on Cherryland, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the right of Cherryland to provide electrical service to the property at issue was not extinguished when all the buildings on the property were demolished. Instead, I conclude that, pursuant to Mich Admin Code, R 460.3411 (Rule 411), once all the buildings on the subject property had been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Boyer-Campbell Co. v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Detroit Base Coalition for the Human Rights of the Handicapped v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API