Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Medical Center & Extended Care Facility v. Harris
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 22, 1982No. Nos. 81-2401, 82-1014PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Metropolitan Medical Center and Extended Care Facility (Metro) received a grant, interest subsidy and loan guaranty under the Hill-Burton Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 291 et seq. As a statutory condition of receiving that Hill-Burton aid, Metro agreed: (1) to make its facilities available to all persons residing in its territorial area — its community service assurance, and (2) to provide a reasonable volume of free medical care to indigents — its free care assurance. Metro also is a provider of medical services under the federal medicare program. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395 et seq. That…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rafaela Euresti v. Richard Stenner, as Administrator of the Weld County General HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Lola Saine v. The Hospital Authority of Hall County and the City of Gainesville and the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Cook v. Ochsner Foundation HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- Corum v. Beth Israel Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murray v. LyngDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- Metropolitan Medical Center and Extended Care Facility v. Patricia Harris, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services the United States of America and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Metropolitan Medical Center and Extended Care Facility v. Patricia Harris, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services the United States of America and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982