Legal Opinion
Murray v. Lyng
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1987No. Civil 4-85-611PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Debra Murray and Annadine Houle brought this action on behalf of themselves and a class of Minnesota foster parents and food stamp recipients against defendant Richard E. Lyng, as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (the “Secretary”), and defendant Leonard Levine, as Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services. 2 Plaintiffs challenge regulations of the United States Department of Agriculture that require foster children to be included in their food stamp “households” and foster care…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lyng v. CastilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rios v. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Foster v. CelaniDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- Murray v. LyngCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Murray v. LyngCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Rios v. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988