Rafaela Euresti v. Richard Stenner, as Administrator of the Weld County General Hospital
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice CLARK:
Appellants seek through this class action to compel the administrators, trustees and county commissioners, who operate the Weld County Hospital, to provide a reasonable amount of free or below costs services to them and others similarly situated. The claim is based on Title VI of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. § 291 et seq., popularly known as the Hill-Burton Act, which provides for federal grants of funds to a State and private parties to build or modernize a hospital facility on condition, inter alia, that the State be given assurances from the private parties…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Doris Holbrook v. Henry C. Pitt, and Third-Party v. Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Third- PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee, Kansas, and Medevac Midamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Umbriac v. American Snacks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- American Hospital Association v. Richard S. Schweiker, and Illinois Migrant Council, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.