Hurt v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
Parties here appear as in the lower court.
Plaintiff sued defendant on a certain promissory note made by the defendant and payable to the plaintiff’s order. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,270.82, which was the amount agreed upon by defendant’s counsel as being due, if the note were valid,
The trial court, sua sponte, set aside the verdict and ordered a new trial, giving as a reason therefor that the following instruction was an erroneous statement of the issues: “The only question for the jury to determine is whether the defendant made and executed the promissory note…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Chartier v. Winslow Crane Service CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Mooney v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
- Scott v. MatsudaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Crosby v. CaninoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Kinzbach v. Midwest Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.