Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1929No. 12,107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Parties here appear as in the lower court.

Plaintiff sued defendant on a certain promissory note made by the defendant and payable to the plaintiff’s order. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,270.82, which was the amount agreed upon by defendant’s counsel as being due, if the note were valid,

The trial court, sua sponte, set aside the verdict and ordered a new trial, giving as a reason therefor that the following instruction was an erroneous statement of the issues: “The only question for the jury to determine is whether the defendant made and executed the promissory note…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chartier v. Winslow Crane Service CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Mooney v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Scott v. MatsudaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Crosby v. CaninoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  5. Kinzbach v. Midwest Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API