Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Canino

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 28, 1931No. 12,509PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

The parties appear as below. The plaintiff was injured through alleged negligence of the defendant, Lett, employee of the defendant, Canino. Trial to a jury resulted in a verdict of $1,500 for the plaintiff. A motion for new trial was granted, to which the plaintiff objected and excepted, and elected to stand on her case as made, whereupon, on motion of the defendants, the action was dismissed. The principal errors assigned are the granting of the motion for new trial and the judgment of dismissal, and it is urged that this court should direct the reinstatement of the verdict and order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. Union Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Ward v. Teller Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  3. Crosby v. CaninoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Hurt v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. Warshauer Sheep & Wool Co. v. Rio Grande State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chartier v. Winslow Crane Service CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Mooney v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Field v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  4. Perdue v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Mooney v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API