Scott v. Matsuda
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland
Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff in the trial court, upon a complaint seeking damages sustained as a result of defendants’ negligence in an automobile accident, obtained a favorable jury verdict. Defendants filed a motion for directed verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial, on the ground of insufficient evidence to support the verdict. On hearing, the trial court set aside the jury verdict and granted a new trial solely upon the issue of negligence. Plaintiff promptly filed motion to reconsider; to overrule the motion for a new trial; and for entry of judgment on the verdict. This motion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mooney v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
- Ward v. Teller Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Hurt v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Warshauer Sheep & Wool Co. v. Rio Grande State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Fey v. ParrishSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
3Cited by18 opinions
- HealthONE v. Rodriguez ex rel. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- King Soopers, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Miller v. Carnation Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Globe Cereal Mills v. Shirlee S. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Hamre v. SengerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.