Legal Opinion

Scott v. Matsuda

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 23, 1953No. 16902PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff in the trial court, upon a complaint seeking damages sustained as a result of defendants’ negligence in an automobile accident, obtained a favorable jury verdict. Defendants filed a motion for directed verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial, on the ground of insufficient evidence to support the verdict. On hearing, the trial court set aside the jury verdict and granted a new trial solely upon the issue of negligence. Plaintiff promptly filed motion to reconsider; to overrule the motion for a new trial; and for entry of judgment on the verdict. This motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mooney v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. Ward v. Teller Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  3. Hurt v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Warshauer Sheep & Wool Co. v. Rio Grande State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Fey v. ParrishSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. HealthONE v. Rodriguez ex rel. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. King Soopers, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Miller v. Carnation Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Globe Cereal Mills v. Shirlee S. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. Hamre v. SengerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API