Legal Opinion
In re N.A. Rugby Union v. U.S. Rugby Football Union
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 17, 2019No. Supreme Court Case 19SA22PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE GABRIEL delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶1 In this original proceeding pursuant to C.A.R. 21, we must determine whether a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement can be required to arbitrate under that agreement by virtue of the fact that it is a purported agent of a signatory to the agreement. Specifically, we are asked to decide whether the district court erred when it entered an order requiring petitioner Rugby International Marketing ("RIM"), which is a defendant below and a nonsignatory to a Professional Rugby Sanction Agreement (the "Sanction Agreement"), to arbitrate…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of TurkmenistanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Intergen N v. v. GrinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Allen v. PachecoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Santich v. VCG Holding Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Linzy v. Conifer Care CommunitiesColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- First American Title v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- Alisha York, as natural mother of a minor on behalf of C.Y. v. UA Attractions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
- Cross v. Amazon.com IncDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.