Legal Opinion
Van Schaick v. Aron
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.
This is an action by the Superintendent of Insurance as liquidator of the General Surety Company to recover *524from its directors damages claimed to have been sustained by reason of alleged illegal investments and loans of the funds of the company. On the trial the plaintiff offered proof of four transactions urged to have been in contravention of statute. In general these were investments of the General Surety Company in the stock of National American Company, Inc., and alleged loans by the General Surety Company to the National American Company, Inc., either unsecured or on. the security of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Hun v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Arthur v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Francis v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Newfield v. EttlingerNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Simon v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1942
- Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.