Legal Opinion

Acker v. Green

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1931No. 4 Div. 578PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The first appeal was on ruling on demurrer and discharge on motion of injunction. Acker v. Green, 216 Ala. 445, 113 So. 411.

The bill was amended by allegation that appellees had continued to cut and remove timber from said land, and prayed judgment for value of the timber or lumber manufactured therefrom. The answer denied all essential allegations; testimony was taken, and submission was for final decree; and judgment denied the relief prayed.

The question of injunctive relief was considered and maintained in Tidwell v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co., 198 Ala. 236, 73 So. 486, L. R. A. 1917C, 232, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Leddon v. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Doe ex dem. Holt v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Acker v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Cox v. BroderickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kerlin v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Jones v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Henry v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. May v. GrangerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API