H. M. Farnham & Sons, Inc. v. Wark
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.
This is an action in assumpsit to recover a balance claimed to be due for an automobile known as a Hudson brougham. The judgment and verdict were for the plaintiff. The defendant takes exceptions to the admission of evidence and the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict.
The plaintiff corporation is a dealer in automobiles with its principal place of business at Montpelier and smaller salesrooms at Barre. In August, 1925, the plaintiff’s salesman, one Houston, called on the defendant at his home in Barre for the purpose of trying to make an exchange of the Hudson brougham for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- French v. WheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- MacDonald, B.N.F. v. OrtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Murray v. NelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Aiken v. KennisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
- Russ v. GoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- State v. PatnaudeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- State v. LapanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Shields v. Vermont Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Paska v. SaundersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.