Legal Opinion

Russ v. Good

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 6, 1916PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Trespass for assault and battery. Plea, son assault demesne. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1914, Washington County, Miles, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

The action is trespass for assault and battery, and the case was tried on a plea of self-defence,' — issue thereon being under the rule, treated as joined. The parties were stone cutters employed in a shed in Barre. It was the custom of the workmen to eat their dinners in a room adjacent to the main shed, at a table so situated that one end of it was against a wall, and one side was only far enough from another wall to make room for a long bench on which the men sat. The evidence was sharply conflicting, but there was testimony tending to show the following facts. The trouble here involved…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rudolph v. LandwerlenIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Smith v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1907
  3. McKinstry v. CollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  4. McQuiggan v. LaddSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
  5. Wright v. McKeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. RoundsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. State v. LapanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  4. In re DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  5. Russ v. GoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API