Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoornbeek

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 13, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

The Government having indicated its intention of proving its case on the “net worth-expenditure” theory,1 it will supply particulars as follows:

1. The claimed net worth of the defendant and his wife as of January 1, 1947.

2. The claimed net worth of the defendant and his wife as of December 31, 1947.

3. The defendant’s and his wife’s expenditures for the calendar year 1947 setting forth (a) the date of each claimed expenditure; (b) the payee thereof; (c) the amount thereof.

4. The deductions allowed in arriving at the claimed net income in count 1 of the indictment.

5.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. CasertaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. United States v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  4. United States v. Empire State Paper CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1968
  2. United States v. GellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  3. United States v. DeGrooteDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1988
  4. United States v. EissnerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API