Legal Opinion

Cook v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1935No. Appeal, 272PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The plaintiff recovered judgment, for damages for personal injuries sustained by her while a passenger in one of defendant’s street cars. Defendant appealed, assigning, as error, refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v.

On January 23, 1932, at about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, the plaintiff and her daughter boarded one of defendant’s trolley cars, northbound on Fifth Street, Philadelphia. After the trolley had passed Tabor Road and was approaching Olney Avenue, where they intended to alight, they arose from their seat located behind the conductor’s booth in the center…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Sanson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Tilton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Zaltouski v. Scranton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Endicott v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Staller v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Schilling v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Bollar v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API