Legal Opinion

Pollack v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 12, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Plaintiff instituted two separate actions to recover damages for injuries to her person and property, asserted to have proximately resulted from defendant’s negligence in the operation, on October 16th, 1933, of one of its motor trucks at the intersection of Rahway avenue and DeHart Place, in the city of Elizabeth. The District Court judge, sitting without a jury, resolved the issues in her favor; and from the consequent judgments defendant appeals. A stenographic transcript of the proceedings and testimony adduced has been certified as the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuzio v. SaylorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  2. Eckman v. BeihlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. Carr v. IorioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  4. Roe Realty Co. v. Sulzbacher Granger & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API