Legal Opinion

Roe Realty Co. v. Sulzbacher Granger & Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 5, 1937Published

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Cueiam.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment in an action brought on a verbal contract for commissions for obtaining a renewal of a lease of part of the premises situate at 910 Bergen avenue, Jersey Oitj', New Jersey. The case was tried in the District Court without a jury. The errors argued are the refusal of the trial court to nonsuit the plaintiff or direct a verdict in favor of the defendant.

“It is fundamental in the District Court act, made so by express provision, that on an appeal such as this, findings of fact on conflicting evidence wll not be reviewed, and conversely, that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pollack v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API