Brown v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SIRICA, District Judge.
On September 18, 1975, Judge Hart, in the exercise of his inherent power to control the judicial process, dismissed this action sua sponte. The plaintiff thereafter moved for a vacation of that order. It is this motion which is now before this Court; it is denied.
Clearly, a district court has the power to dismiss a case sua sponte if it is frivolous or brought for some ulterior purpose such as harassment. 1 J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶.0.60[6] (2d ed. 1975). After he read the complaint in this case, Judge Hart evidently felt that either of these…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Brown v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- Lewis v. BayhDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Keith M. Rhinehart v. Beverly StaufferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Ramsey v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Tate v. BurkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.