Rex L. Shuffler and Betty L. Shuffler v. Heritage Bank, a California Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Appellants challenge an order of the district court finding them in civil contempt of a prior order of the court and imposing a fine of $500 per day for the duration of their contumacy. We sustain the finding of contempt but vacate the sanction order and remand for entry of a statement of the purpose or purposes of the contempt sanction and findings to support the fine and such recalculation as may be required to determine the amount of the fine consonant with the purpose or purposes of the sanction.
I
FACTS
On November 10, 1980, Rex L. Shuffler and Betty L. Shuffler (the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., and Ringsby-Pacific, Ltd. v. Western Conference of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- New York State National Organization for Women v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc., and Nme Hospitals, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Whittaker Corporation Whittaker Controls, Inc. v. Execuair Corporation Execuair Sales Corporation David ManhanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- General Signal Corporation v. Donallco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.