Legal Opinion

Wright v. Tudor City Twelfth Unit, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1938PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The plaintiff, while proceeding lawfully along the sidewalk, slipped upon a rubber mat lying on the sidewalk and fell, brealdng his right arm. The rubber mat, with other mats and runners, was being cleaned with soap and water on Forty-second street in New York city, in front of the premises owned by the defendant Tudor City Twelfth Unit, Inc., and operated and managed by the defendant Fred C. French Management Co., Inc. These mats and runners were used in the lobby of the defendant’s hotel. The defendant set up as a defense to this action that those who were cleaning the mats were employees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boylhart v. DiMarco & Reimann, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Rohlfs v. WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Kleeman v. RheingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Rosenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Willis E. Wilson, Rep., Estate of Tomikia Wilson v. Good Humor Corporation and David A. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API