Legal Opinion

Rohlfs v. Weil

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1936PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

While plaintiff Marguerite Rohlfs was descending a stairway which connects the surface of the street with the subway railroad station at Broadway and Thirty-fourth street in New York, one end of a scaffold which was insecurely suspended from the adjoining building above the highway gave way and a painter at work on the scaffold fell and his body struck and seriously injured plaintiff. No barricades or danger signals were posted on the sidewalk or elsewhere to warn pedestrians of the presence of this scaffold suspended over them.

The entire building was leased from the owner by appellant Gotham…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Melker v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Mullins v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Appel v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Boylhart v. DiMarco & Reimann, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Wright v. Tudor City Twelfth Unit, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Delaney v. Philhern Realty Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Leonard Wallach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API