Legal Opinion
Stone v. Heyman Bros.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 1932No. Docket No. 8359PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiffs sued for damages for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Stone in falling through a skylight in a building which plaintiffs purchased from defendant. The appeal is from a judgment for defendant following an order sustaining a demurrer to the third amended complaint.
This complaint alleged that the building was constructed by defendant and sold to plaintiffs on May 2, 1929, for residential purposes; that the skylight was constructed of clear glass one-eighth of an inch thick and did not comply with the requirements of the municipal building ordinance; that this defect was unknown to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Smith v. TuckerTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Upp v. DarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Palmore v. Morris, Tasker & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Denman v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Copfer v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Kordig v. Grovedale Oleander Homes, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Zavalney v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Kordig v. Grovedale Oleander Homes, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958