Legal Opinion

Veal v. Leimkuehler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1952No. 28384PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

249 S.W.2d 491 (1952)

VEAL et al.

v.

LEIMKUEHLER et al.

No. 28384.

St. Louis Court of Appeals, Missouri.

May 20, 1952.

Rehearing Denied June 27, 1952.

Timothy R. Veal, St. Louis, pro se and for appellants.

James E. Crowe, City Counselor, John P. McCammon, Associate City Counselor and John J. Shanahan, Asst. City Counselor, St. Louis, for respondents.

HOUSER, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis sustaining and affirming an order of the board of adjustment of said city revoking an alteration permit granted by the building commissioner to Timothy…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. Wagner Electric CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. Byfield v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. State Ex Rel. Rice v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Botz v. GarrettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Hoffman v. Mayor C.C. of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Missouri Church of Scientology v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Beckemeier v. BaesslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Brown v. BeucMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. White v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Bartholomew v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API